On Aug 27, 2019 Eso posted this video on his main channel.
In it, he makes a series of claims against podcaster, YouTuber, and Twitter shitposter Jim Jesus. a.k.a. me. Here we will go through every claim he makes and fact check all of them. This should be good, so get the popcorn.
We’ll skip over minor things he says that are factually wrong for the sake of brevity like how at the beginning of the video where he claims to hate drama.
0:50 He says he doesn’t want to make this video because it’s going to cover topics about the Tsar Bomba stuff which he claims people refer to as the “Great Anarchist Meme War of 2018.” Though most people know it as the Ancap Civil War, where Eso smeared, slandered, and doxed Mr. Dapperton for being critical of the well-established shenanigans of Operation Blueism. I wonder what memes he could be referring to, perhaps #DeadbeatDaddyDapperton because that meme didn’t quite catch on.
4:41 Eso describes the feud between him and Mr. Dapperton. He claims he was unaware of Blue’s sociopathic history. This is false. Eso was told by many people Blue was not to be trusted by both people in the ancap community like Mr. Dapperton and those who remembered his public spat with him, but also concerned communists who reached out to people in the YouTube ancap communities to issue that warning. Blue’s exploits were well documented over various social media platforms, including YouTube and YouTube channels Eso was either subscribed to or he monitored for rebuttal videos. When presented with these he outright rejected all of those claims, including personal accounts by people he trusted. To say he was unaware is a complete fabrication. Also Filthy said later that he knew these claims were true but did the war anyway because said he felt Dapperton was trying to “control him.”
6:00 Eso claims that the Tsar Bomba turned out to be true. It was not and even Blue’s closes confidant in this operation came clean and said the Tsar Bomba was just another one of Blue’s scams.
Bat’ko and Danov went though every screenshot and video in the Tsar Bomba showing why this was a nothing-burger.
6:54 Eso claims that the name “Operation: Anarchism” was never tied to Blue but operationanarchism.com uses Blue’s logo and mirrored his content from his then main website operationblueism.com. This was pointed out to him but he ignored it. You can see these on the Wayback Machine for operationblueism.com and operationanarchism.com It is also worth pointing out the reason for the attacks by Marxists he mentions later on was because of the initial catalyst for the Tsar Bomba which is documented at the beginning of this article and his new association with Blue. This was the threats to leak Boot’s nude pictures.
7:40 Eso claims the reason why Dapperton reached out to DemocraticSocialist01 to create fake screenshots showing DemSoc01 was paying off Dapperton to diss Eso was unclear to him. This, again, was explained to him hundreds of times. They did it to point out how gullible Eso was were Eso said he wasn’t. That was why he believed Blue’s crap over the mountains of evidence showing Blue was a liar and a fraud. Of course, he fell for it, just like he fell for Ash’s hoax documented in this video because he’s super gullible. Maybe the reason he doesn’t understand is because he refuses to believe he’s gullible.
He goes on in this part to say that because of that prank, it gave Blue more credibility. However, Blue shouldn’t have had credibility from the get-go because everything he claimed was provably false before any of this even happened.
10:55 He then adds that this lead to Blue leaving a comment on Dapperton’s channel leaking the name of Dapperton’s ex and the mother of his child. This is false. While Blue did leave a comment on that video it was Eso who left the damning comment seen here:
Eso also uploaded this video before leaving that comment which you can see the mirror here:
Here is a screenshot of the video and all of the comments left on it.
12:18 Here Eso beings to say that the point where he realized he was in the wrong and fall into an “existential crisis” was laving a comment on Dapperton’s channel saying he didn’t realize why he ever liked Dapperton’s channel. It wasn’t doxing his family, it wasn’t making claims about these Marxist without seeing any of the evidence that he said he had to support those claims, it wasn’t him dividing the whole community; no. It was him reflecting on something vein he posted about Dapperton’s content.
14:53 In the typical Eso fare, 2/5ths of this video had nothing to do with Jim Jesus (the topic of the video) and this is where we finally get into Jim. Before we dig into this, this whole intro is important because Jim has been a real thorn in Eso’s side because he was the one who pointed out regularly that Eso is a doxer. He doxed his family on DeviantArt, he threatened to dox a user on his channel a month before the Tsar Bomba thing went down, and he threatened to leak the nudes of Boot, before finally doxing Dapperton’s family. He’s setting the table as being a victim of Blue and having no real hand in his doxing so he can undermine Jim’s claims. Poisoning the well for anything Jim says from then on.
Eso claims Jim takes things out of context. Citation needed.
The only time he’s ever tried to show I did this was this video which he claimed I photoshopped a screenshot which he later admitted I didn’t once people who saw him post it called him out. They also called him out for editing out the (edited) marker on Discord to make it seem like his edit was the original post.
It’s interesting that the time he wanted to prove this it turned out he was the one photoshopping to lie about me. Really makes you think.
16:20 Eso claims that I commented on every one of his videos and bashing him and Eso ignored this because Jim was a smaller YouTuber. However, he doesn’t provide any evidence for this at all. He says that I was spamming my social media feed with talk of him. Also, a twitter search from the range of January 1, 2016 (the year he came to YouTube as Esoteric Entity) to December 31, 2017 (The year I first mention) you’ll only see a handful of tweets including one that will be brought up later, and the rest was a back and forth I had with him which he denies ever happened. Worth noting he offered to have a debate with me in that thread which he backed out of. Eso said he ignored me (he did not as you can see his now banned account responding) because I was a smaller YouTuber and he felt like it was “punching down” but his account was full of response videos and debates to smaller YouTubers like Eastern Marxist, Frédéric Voltaire Bastiat, and The Rational Outlaw. He did acknowledge me, he did respond to me, and even offered to have me on for a debate which he backed out of.
16:59 He says most of my social media is dedicated to talking about him. This lie is easily disproven with anyone willing to invest a few minutes to investigate. You can use Twitter’s advanced search to check any time period from my account and judge yourself the volume of Eso related posts to posts about other things. A tutorial on how to use Twitter’s advanced search is here.
He also claims in this part that it got worse recently. Let’s check about 3 months before this video. Hmmm, seems like most of those are responding to people asking me about him but still, it’s hardly anything. 8 tweets in 3 months. It is worth pointing out that this won’t show everything, like things not mentioning his name in text but it’s still the best we can do since he doesn’t offer any evidence of this at all. It’s almost like he’s full of shit, right?
How about YouTube? Well, good thing YouTube lets you see the videos I make and you can make a judgment on how many of those are about Eso.
17:47 Eso claims Dapperton re-uploaded most of the videos I made about Eso. This is false. Dapperton only re-uploaded a 2 of videos of mine regarding Eso or Blue, one of which was a podcast that was only on my Patreon. Again, he doesn’t cite what videos, give screenshots or anything. I’m not going to comment about my average view count because my ego is not wrapped up in my metrics. I’m more interested in making quality over popularity. If you haven’t noticed a trend in this video I’ll point it out now. Most of this has to do with Eso’s metrics. I’m a smaller YouTuber, I didn’t get views, he was bigger than me, I got attention by having my videos mirrored, his view counts are dropping because of me, we’re going to get subscribers out of the Data Drop…etc.. This is all about Eso’s ego and because I put a dent in it, he’s hurt. Sorry, dude. If you don’t want your ego bruised, don’t do shady shit.
18:05 Eso claims I’m not Dapperton’s friend. This is false, Daps is my boy. He claims that I say in my videos I hate him and I think he’s stupid. He never points to any of these videos because they do not exist. I do say (and I make it no secret to him either) that I’m not a fan of his a good chunk of his content. He’s fine with this because he’s not an egotistical person who wraps his identity over the content he makes. I have videos Dapperton says he’s not a fan of too. You can’t please everyone all of the time, that doesn’t mean we hate each other now. Unbelievable.
18:22 Eso says I have a clique who does anything I tell them. His evidence is whenever I get in an argument with someone Shiny, Toast, or Prom will jump in to defend me. One, it’s not true. Lots of times I had back and forths with him in that server they were not there. Two, just because other people hate you doesn’t mean I’m pulling their strings. How do you know I’m not just one of their puppets? This is just paranoia.
19:13 Eso says that the reason Shiny and Prom mass banned people from Dapperton’s old server was because of the dispute over the “fetishes aren’t sexual” comment he made in Shane’s server a full 4 months after this incident. So, either he’s accusing us of all being time travelers who went back in time 4 and a half months to destroy Dapperton’s server or he’s full of shit. Dapperon’s server was destroyed on January 1, 2018 and the comment was made April 19th, 2018. The reason they gave for doing that to Dapperton’s server was all about something that Shane Killian did and had nothing to do with Eso at all. A topic we’re not going to touch on here because it’s not relevant. I had no role in the closure of Dapperton’s first server. I was in my own server drunk talking to other friends about bullshit, celebrating the new year unaware of what was going on elsewhere.
23:27 – Eso makes the claim that in a video channel I run called “Blue Backup” where I archive videos relating to Blue for archival purposes and warn others against Blue and his sociopathy that I left a dishonest description in the description box claiming that audio recordings were recorded while Eso and Blue were still on good terms and were recorded without Eso’s knowledge.
Here is the full text of the description box which you can read yourself. This was copied and pasted directly from Encyclopedia Dramatica from his page so they could be shown there instead of having just links to those audio files Eso was hosting on Google Drive and could stay up even if those files were deleted.
It has now come out through leaked google drives that Blue from the very start of his Tsar Bomba data drop was the only one with all the evidence of /leftypol/’s biggest youtubers being pedophiles and soliticing along with trading CP through Discord. In one of the leaked chats, Blue tells us a story of how he took his data drop to a advertising agent and told him what was on it, evidence that supposedly proves /leftypol/ of being “pedophiles, doxxers, and false flagging.” and supposedly the advertising agent had asked blue “What is your incentive in releasing this, what do you expect to gain out of this”? to which Blue supposedly answered: “I told him, my self-interest in this issue is to, you know, gain fame and notoriety and subs and views and attention towards us and our ideology whilst simultaneously destroying the enemy.” It gets interesting because then the advertising agent had again, supposedly said this to blue in response: “Absolute hard evidence is indestructible, but don’t be shy to act on circumstantial evidence or accusational evidence because assusational or circumstantial evidence, uhm, can definitely tarnish peoples reputation and it’s the accusational and circumstantial evidence that is going to allow this, uhhh.., this, this, basically PR campaign of drama that we created to continue. Because what damages peoples reputation is proof, hard evidence, but what creates long standing outstanding drama to drag on the issue and gives us more attention and get people to talk about us which, gee, anyone who is anyone is talking about me and you. Now, as it was said earlier, Blue was the only one who had this supposed evidence. This becomes made clear when listening to the drives, because when conversing with Esoteric Entity it is shown that even he had no idea what the actual evidence was and says to Blue: “That’s the problem I have been noticing from the beginning, you’re holding all the evidence so I don’t know what we really have.” To which Blue simply responds: “Well I am telling you what we have.” This is especially hilarious because throughout this fiasco it was heard from Blue and Esoteric that they were not trying to profit from the data drop, but that they were honest with their intentions and had reported those they accused to Discord. But what these google drives only further prove is the extent that Blue and Esoteric Entity were willing to libel and slander their political rivals to potentially destroy their lives with false allegations so they could gain Youtube fame. extent that Blue and Esoteric Entity were willing to libel and slander their political rivals to potentially destroy their lives with false allegations so they could gain Youtube fame.
You can see from the archive of his ED page that nothing was changed. Unfortunately, ED is currently down but if you want to can download the last snapshot here and dig it out yourself if you have the time. I will update this when ED goes live soon. I’ll save you the effort; it was copied and pasted, and it doesn’t it say it was recorded without his knowledge. It does say he conspired to do bad things because they do say that. Here’s the Blue Tapes playlist. Listen for yourself.
25:00 He claims he confronted me then I doxed him. This is false, I told him repeatedly in that conversation I just copied and pasted the ED description of them and they didn’t say anything false or anything saying it was recorded with or without his knowledge or what his relation with Blue was. The topic then turned into asking why he refuses to acknowledge he doxed Dapperton’s family. He said it’s not doxing because it was stuff they could be found on Google. If it’s public then it’s not doxing. Well, because he posted on his old Public Facebook page which was linked on his older videos and his ED page. I asked him if I could link the article repeatedly to make a point about public posts not being doxing. He kept ignoring me. Finally, Dapperton asked if Eso mided if I posted the article and Eso called my bluff and said no he didn’t mind.
So I posted the article that mentions him at the end which he denied it was him. Later he said that it wasn’t him and that it was a friend of his and he did, in fact, post that on his social media account to another user Mastercactie.
The point was clear; Releasing his name using something that was published in a newspaper that he posted on his public social media page with his permission was doxing, then how was him releasing Dapperton’s family names and addresses without his permission not doxing because it was “public?”
If he told me or Daps not to publish it or refused to answer it wouldn’t have been posted, but he said that he didn’t mind if we posted it so I did.
So here’s where it gets interesting. He claims the alias “Zach/Zack [Omitted]” is not his real name. He said this numerous times. Even in this video where he alleged I doxed his family at about 10:35
So did I dox him or did I release an alias he says he posted publicly? Really makes you think, doesn’t it? Furthermore, how was I so wrong about his real name that I got his family name right? Even worse, why does the screenshot that is supposed to be the smoking gun not even me? I’m not Mastercactie.
25:28 He said Mastercactie said I sent him that information. There’s no proof of this and Mastercactie denies he said this and I deny I saw any of it because I haven’t.
25:30 Eso says he doesn’t need to give specific proof of me doxing his family to know I’m guilty as sin. Maybe but you need to have something that leads you to believe that, and you’d need at least some solid evidence to make that accusation publicly and you’ve provided none. If and when I do make any claim against him, he demands this level of evidence. Why he is privileged to demand a different standard of evidence is beyond me. I guess he’s just allowed to make baseless accusations against people but everyone else has to provide irrefutable proof.
25:50 Eso claims to used deductive reasoning to figure out how I doxed his family but doesn’t explain this or walks us through this reasoning. He says he never gave the Zack/Zach name out yet we can see him saying he did use this alias on those social media accounts.
26:21 Eso says I doxxed his family and we already went through all of those claims above.
27:07 Eso claims I said he legally can’t drive a car. That didn’t come from me, that came from roguemillenial and Itza Bananz who both said they remember Eso uploading a video where he said he wasn’t legally allowed to drive. You’ll have to ask the people who made that allegation, not me.
I didn’t say you secretly have fetal alcohol syndrome, I said you do. It’s consistent in your actions and your facial features. I invite anyone interested to look here at fascial features and list of behaviors associated with FASD and then compare here. Let’s be honest, he is pretty fucking stupid. I mean, really stupid. I mean, really, really, really, fucking stupid.
27:20 Speaking of really stupid he says that I selectively edited a video that made him look like he was getting his ass handed to him.
If you think I selectively edited that stream to make him look bad, then compare it to the whole stream and I invite you to find how I edited this to make him look stupid. I put in the parts where he and Eso had debates. At the end of the video, he said he was sorry for turning his Q&A into a debate. Here’s the whole stream.
28:00 he claims I blocked people who called him out. This is false. I’ve had a long-standing policy on my channel. If you delete my comments from your channel I get to do the same. Your fans were fine with you deleting comments, so surely they wouldn’t have a problem with me deleting their comments too, right? Interesting that you have a problem when I delete those comments, but when you delete comments from this video it’s fine. I kept Nate’s comment up. It’s still viewable as of writing this. So that was bullshit. You can see it highlighted if you click here. This exchange with one of his fans was particularly embarrassing, and it’s still up. So when he deletes comments, that’s fine. When I do it I’m an “intellectual coward.” Cool.
28:10 Claims my video was getting ratioed (which BTW this video has a better ratio at the time of this recording than the video I’m responding to right now)
He said that I “dog-whistled” to my Marxist friends. Interesting way of putting it. More like you and your friends came on to my video and raided it and I pointed that out on my Twitter and said that if you like my video to show it some love to fight against the vote botting.
Also no, I didn’t tell anyone to dislike it. Again; I need evidence when I make claims. Eso gets free range to make shit up and never back up anything he ever says.
28:17 He says I have friends or an alt that takes screencaps of his server. Yes, I did. That person was Mr. Dapperton. He would see you say stupid shit and show it around to people who wanted to have a giggle at your stupidity. Now there’s lots of people who screencap the stupid shit he says and posts it all kinds of places. It’s a free-for-all now.
28:50 says I’m doing stuff to push him into making a response when at the time I did this I was heavily throttling talking about Eso for months beforehand. We’ve already demonstrated earlier this was false.
29:00 Eso is saying that recently before this video was produced I was claiming he was a pedophile. His proof was a tweet that was 2 years old that he edited and didn’t link directly. This is the screenshot for that claim.
Here is a link to that tweet and here’s a screenshot of it.
So why did he lie about the day and omit the context of him actually liking fury loli shit? You said you made this video because I recently called you a pedophile and not talking about your loli furry fetish. Where? Is 2 years ago recent?
29:46 Eso claims I said I never called him a pedophile, which is true because he doesn’t know how grammatical qualifiers work. Is he a pedo? No. There’s no evidence he likes actual children. Does he think drawn children that look like animals are sexy? Yes. He’s a furry loli pedo.
Eso also denies he drew loli porn but only liked other people’s loli porn. This is false.
Eso says in the section that he doesn’t care if people share that stuff.
Eso keeps claiming this was a long time ago, but a lot of these were made in 2016 and he denies he draws it or is sexually attracted to it.
30:32 He again says he doesn’t mind that people know about this and doesn’t hide this.
30:50 Says he doesn’t want people knowing about that or sharing it because this takes away from his credibility. This person really does exist.
31:45 Oh yes, Michelle Catlin. You should go and read this before we get into her and show his claim that she solicited child porn was bullshit. But yes, when someone makes fraudulent claims against someone to discredit them, I take issue. I won’t be defending her here, if you want to see the full rebuttal go here.
32:49 Claims the screenshots did not come from Davis Sherratt. Unfortunately, he did say they came from Sherratt in a voice call and in the description of his video. So that’s a lie. If you want to know why David Sherratt is relevant, go read the Michelle Catlin post here.
33:02 Eso claims that in these two twitter threads and a single tweet that I claimed I thought it was OK for 13-17 year old kids to share nudes. So let’s see where I said this. First link is to a tweet.
Yes. It would not matter if Michelle Catlin is a pedo, or a rapist, or a murderer, or a car thief. None of those changes the fact that Eso solicited child pornography to own the libs. Is Eso trying to say I’m saying it doesn’t matter if she’s a pedo full stop? That would be stupid. You’d have to have Fetal Alcohol Syndrome to read it that way. The next 2 tweets in this list are just bullshit. The red arrow is the first of the two tweets he links and the green is the second. Both are in a Twitter thread. If this isn’t taking things out of context I don’t know what is, even still those tweets in isolation are pretty clear. Here’s the whole thread anyway.
If you’re going to take people out of context, Eso. Do a better job. This is just terrible. And the last tweet of the bunch is too in a thread but I have no idea what he’s insinuating it’s saying. The tweet is marked by an orange arrow.
OK?
33:30 Eso takes me out of context to explain how I took him out of context when he said that Cody Wilson allegedly slept with a girl who was 17 (she was 16, but whatever) and he thought that was OK as proof he’s a pedophile. Ironic that’s taking me out of context. The point was Eso said 17 is well past the age of sexual maturity and that it was OK Cody Cody slept with a 17-year-old. If he’s going to hold that 17-year-olds are well past the point of sexual maturity then he would at least hold that 16 are also well past the age of sexual maturity or at least at the line of sexual maturity and are OK too. If so, you can’t complain that Michelle Catlin got steamy with a 16-year-old because it too is legal in her county, it too is past the line of sexual maturity, and it too wasn’t explained upfront the true age of the minor. My point was you hold contradictory views on the age of consent.
(Just for the record, I think Cody Wilson should be found innocent since she handed him a fake ID when he tried to card her, not that sex with 16-year-olds is OK. He was tricked into believing she was 18)
My point was never “Ew, you’re gross for liking 16-year-olds.” My point was always that this is a contradiction to say “It’s OK for Cody to sleep with a 16-year-old but not Catlin because I don’t like her so I’m going to publicly accuse of pedophilia.” This was explained to you in a voice call. I explained it multiple times to you. Other people in the call were getting upset that you refused to understand and they intervened to explain it to you. You refused to understand what I was saying for 15 minutes until finally, you realized what we all were telling you. There was an audience too. So this isn’t you being stupid, this is you being stupid and dishonest simultaneously.
33:50 Eso says I’m OK with revenge porn. I have no clue where he got this considering I called him out for trying to revenge porn Boot. Let’s skip this bit because this is projection and projection I’ve already established this with evidence.
33:52 Eso says I was obsessed with Shane. No, Shane and I had a disagreement. He went crazy and blocked me and that was the end of that. We’ve already taught you how to look up my social media stuff, go ahead and find where I was obsessing over him, please.
He says I was obsessed with Molyneux. Well, yea. I blew the whistle on him filing false DMCAs against TruShibes when most libertarians had no clue what was going on. If I didn’t call him out there’s a good chance this would have gone completely unnoticed by other libertarians. My videos lead to The Freedom Feens talking about that on-air which lead to Free Talk Live reporting it. Don’t believe me?
Yes, I call out libertarians who are bad actors. I’ve called out Tony “I run fake charities and squander the money” Styles, I’ve called out Adam “My dad ripped people off and so will I” Kokesh, and now I’m calling out you Esoteric “Everyone who disagrees with me will get slandered as a pedo” Entity. BTW, let’s not forget some of the libertarian people who’ve had beefs with and went hard in the paint with TrueDilTom, StyxHexenHammer666, Frédéric Voltaire Bastiat, Michelle Catlin, Rational Outlaw, Mr. Dapperton, and Hanns-Hermann Hoppe. Anyone else I’m forgetting? You routinely attack other libertarians so don’t act like your hands are clean, buddy.
36:21 Eso claims the reason I do all of this is to debate him. The only person who insisted on any kind of debate was you and any time I accepted you backed out. Hoploo tried to talk me into a debate with you while you two were still friends but I eventually decided against it after you accused me of doxing your family because you can’t reason with people who pathologically lie all of the time.
36:21 Eso accuses me of likely sending mail bombs to his house or parking outside of his house for days at a time. How about instead of imagining things I could do, why don’t you actually get around to talking about something I actually did do. All we got was bullshit, you exposing your illiteracy, and projection.
38:16 He attempts to say that I’m the representative of consequentialist libertarianism and because of that consequentialism is bad. I’m sure there’s a name for that logical fallacy.
I guess that’s about it. Let’s go through his screenshots he links in a Google Drive. I am putting this in the order he put them in so forgive the order, Eso is stupid.
And that’s it! Just a load of trash, stupidity, and projection from Eso. Nothing new here.